Display:


Even better- if I could only find the original (1.46 / 13)


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 11:00:03 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Even better- if I could only find the original (2.00 / 5)

Gosh, Alegre, what's wrong with Carrie Underwood? Or just not an Eagles fan?


Serious question- Is This Snark?
by ragekage on Mon Jun 02, 2008 at 11:16:12 PM EST
[ Parent ]

please (2.00 / 2)

stop.

This is just spamming and hijacking.


Washington Woman

Progressive Blue

by kevin22262 on Tue Jun 03, 2008 at 12:27:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Obama not responsible for alleged acts ???? (2.00 / 2)

Isn't that what Bush / Cheney / Rumsfeld said about Abu Graib (sp?) and Guantanamo?
It's always just a few bad apples, eh?
John McCain says he would stay in Iraq for 100 years? That's crazy talk!
by kosnomore on Tue Jun 03, 2008 at 12:30:45 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama not responsible for alleged acts ???? (none / 0)

Exactly!!! It's just a coincidence that "all this crap" was so widespread, and similar in nature.

There should be an investigation - "rules are rules".


by valleyboy on Tue Jun 03, 2008 at 12:53:36 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Whitewater, cattle futures, travelgate (none / 0)

Wow, remind me what happened in the 90s and apply your own logic to that situation.

Hurts doesn't it?


by Regenman on Tue Jun 03, 2008 at 03:39:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama not responsible for alleged acts ???? (2.00 / 1)

Ok you need it explained to you.

Clinton's Campaign was incompetent and outclassed at every level.  They admitted they did not even know the rules to the Texas Primary.  Since they were so clueless and incompetent, they were incapable of training supporters in the Caucus process.  The Obama camp was holding classes on how to conduct themselves and how the process worked.  These things were both reported on prior to the Texas Primary.

On the Primary day, the news organizations had a number of people, that supported both Obama and Clinton on TV complaining about the Caucuses.  The thing was all these people complaining admitted they had never been to a caucus before.  They did not understand the process. And felt intimidated, and excluded.  This is fairly typical of all the caucuses, even more so this year when we had record turnout, and record first time turnout of people that did not understand the process.  It was more pronounced on the Clinton side because her base of support, has been less educated, and less informed, compounded by the disorganization and incompetence of the national campaign.

I know people want to blame the other side.  But this notion of an organized criminal attack is absurd.  People had problems with the process because they did not understand it, and because of their lack of understanding they felt intimidated and that the process was being taken advantage of by those who did understand it.   Some people really like to be the victim, and this idea that the whole world is against them must be comforting for them.  I do not think the Texas law enforcement, or related agencies as well as all the media outlets have an Obama bias.  When a Clinton supporter contradicts you they are a Judas, when  a right wing person does it they are trying to steal the election for the weaker candidate, when an Obama supporter does it they are a cultists.   I am going to be really amused with the logic you are going to come up with how Hillary Clinton is betraying Hillary Clinton when she supports the Democratic Nominee.  Or are you holding out hope that she splits the party like the Taft/Teddy Roosevelt split did to the Republicans, resulting in the election of Wilson.


Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win. ~ Sun Tzu
by Tumult on Tue Jun 03, 2008 at 04:14:32 AM EST
[ Parent ]